Date: October 3, 2024
Source: PLOS ONE
A groundbreaking study published in the open-access journal PLOS ONE has revealed that environmental quality of life significantly influences women’s overall quality of life and health. Led by Suzanne Skevington from the University of Manchester, U.K., the research analyzed data from 17,608 adults across 43 cultures worldwide, shedding light on the critical link between women’s environmental circumstances and their well-being.
Traditionally, assessments of health-related quality of life have focused predominantly on physical and psychological dimensions, often neglecting essential aspects such as environmental, social, and spiritual factors. To address this oversight, Skevington and her team conducted an extensive analysis across six quality of life domains: physical, psychological, independence, social, environmental, and spiritual.
The findings are striking: environmental quality of life accounts for an impressive 46% of women’s overall quality of life and health. Among the various domains assessed, the home environment was identified as the most significant contributor to this result.
Moreover, the study highlights notable differences in quality of life across age groups. Women under 45 reported poorer quality of life across all domains, while those over 45 experienced marked improvements. Notably, after the age of 75, high levels of environmental quality of life were sustained, suggesting a strong correlation between age and environmental conditions.
These results provide insight into the motivations behind environmental activism, particularly among younger women, who may be driven by their experiences of diminished environmental quality. Conversely, the favorable environmental quality of life reported by older women emphasizes the importance of maintaining these standards for future generations.
The authors point out that the data for this study was collected prior to the widespread recognition of how climate change and biodiversity loss could impact human behavior. This aspect opens avenues for future research, particularly in understanding how women’s perceptions of their environment influence their actions toward climate advocacy and sustainability.
The implications of this study are significant, underscoring the necessity of including environmental, social, and spiritual quality of life in assessments of women’s health and well-being. This information could inform timely interventions aimed at enhancing the quality of life for both young and older women.
In conclusion, Skevington and her colleagues emphasize the substantial impact of environmental factors on women’s quality of life, noting that elements such as home conditions, financial resources, and pollution levels are critical determinants. As awareness of these issues grows, the need for integrated approaches to improve women’s quality of life becomes ever more apparent.