Large-scale research highlights the limitations of digital health interventions
A groundbreaking study led by the Technical University of Munich (TUM) has revealed that telemedicine and exercise apps provide only minimal benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease. The study, published in Nature Medicine, raises concerns about the growing reliance on digital health solutions and underscores the continued importance of direct medical care.
Assessing the Impact of Telemedicine
Patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease face a heightened risk of heart attacks and other complications. Lifestyle modifications—such as increased physical activity and improved dietary habits—are widely recognized as effective means of mitigating these risks. The study aimed to evaluate whether telemedicine and digital exercise programs could enhance adherence to these lifestyle changes.
The research, conducted across 11 locations in Germany, involved 502 participants, 84% of whom were men. Participants were divided into two groups: a control group that received standard medical care, dietary guidelines, and informational materials, and an intervention group that followed an app-supported home exercise program with personalized nutrition recommendations. During the first phase, participants in the intervention group also received regular phone support.
Limited Improvements and Low Engagement
After six months, researchers observed only a slight improvement of -0.13 percentage points in long-term blood glucose levels within the intervention group. While statistically significant, the change was deemed clinically minor. Moreover, no notable improvements were seen in other critical risk factors, such as blood pressure and cholesterol levels.
For participants who adhered strictly to the training and diet guidelines, the improvement reached -0.3 percentage points, along with statistically significant changes in body weight, waist circumference, and triglyceride levels. However, these benefits disappeared after the second phase when participants were left to follow the program independently.
Low adherence emerged as a key issue. Only 41% of participants met the exercise regimen criteria, with nearly half failing to complete the prescribed weekly exercise even once. Furthermore, around a quarter of participants never initiated the training program. Technology barriers also played a role, as two-thirds of the participants—most of whom had an average age of 68—reported difficulties using the apps and digital tools.
Expert Opinions: ‘High Effort, Low Return’
Professor Martin Halle, the study’s senior author and an expert in preventive sports medicine at TUM, emphasized the need for large-scale studies to assess the real-world effectiveness of digital health interventions. He pointed out that Germany is one of the first European nations to integrate digital medical services into health insurance coverage, largely due to a shortage of healthcare professionals.
“The individualized support we tested required substantial effort, but the benefits were modest,” said Halle. “Many older patients struggle with technology, yet they are the ones most affected by these conditions.”
Halle stressed that the findings reinforce the necessity of a comprehensive healthcare approach that combines digital tools with traditional patient care. “The enthusiasm surrounding medical apps needs to be tempered with realistic expectations. Personalized medical attention remains irreplaceable, particularly in complex chronic conditions like diabetes and heart disease.”
Conclusion
The study underscores the challenges of implementing digital health solutions for older patients and those with chronic conditions. While telemedicine and exercise apps may offer some benefits, they cannot replace direct care from healthcare professionals. Moving forward, experts advocate for a balanced approach that integrates technological advancements with hands-on medical support.
Disclaimer: The findings of this study reflect the outcomes observed within the specific research parameters and population sample. Individual results may vary, and patients are encouraged to consult their healthcare providers before making decisions about their treatment and lifestyle changes.