0
0
Amidst the growing popularity of natural wines and the myriad health claims circulating, experts weigh in to untangle the truth behind these assertions.
Despite its recent surge, natural wine isn’t a newfound trend but a practice steeped in ancient traditions of grape fermentation without additives. The flavors of natural wine are uniquely influenced by the terroir—where the grapes are grown—and the region’s distinctive characteristics.
Advocates of natural wines emphasize their minimal intervention approach, avoiding additives like sulfites and steering clear of pesticides or chemicals. However, experts caution that many perceived health benefits lack solid scientific backing.
Kesley Costa, a registered dietitian nutritionist, dismisses the notion that natural wines are inherently healthier. She highlights that the natural wine movement’s perceived healthiness remains unsupported by substantial scientific evidence, echoing concerns of deceptive narratives around alcohol’s health benefits.
Distinguished from conventional wine, natural wines emerge from smaller-scale, sustainable vineyards, championing organic and biodynamic viticulture practices. While conventional wines often use multiple additives, natural wines stick to minimal intervention during the winemaking process.
Winemaker Georges Kalligeros contends that natural wines offer a healthier alternative due to their organic and sustainable grape farming methods, steering clear of harmful chemicals commonly used in conventional viticulture.
Alice Fiering, a wine writer, backs the view, asserting that organic grapes and limited sulfites in natural wines render them healthier for both consumers and winemakers.
However, the World Health Organization’s cautionary stance on alcohol—declaring no safe level of consumption—remains paramount, emphasizing moderation. Dr. Andrew Waterhouse, a wine chemist, highlights the genetic predisposition concerning sulfite sensitivity, which affects a fraction of the population.
The slow metabolism of alcohol in natural wines compared to conventional ones has stirred discussions, albeit with limited scientific backing. Lowering alcohol consumption remains a priority, irrespective of wine type, owing to its potential adverse effects.
Claims about natural wine’s impact on gut health remain ambiguous. While some studies suggest a potential link between red wine consumption and gut microbiome diversity, broader research emphasizes the detrimental effects of alcohol on gut health, possibly outweighing any perceived benefits.
In essence, while natural wine production may tout environmental and minimal intervention advantages, claims regarding its significant health benefits lack robust scientific evidence. Moderation remains the key takeaway, with individual considerations suggesting abstinence from alcohol for those with underlying health conditions.
In navigating the natural versus conventional wine debate, the emphasis on responsible and moderate consumption is paramount for overall well-being.
