0
0
Chennai, July 1, 2025 — In a landmark judgment, the Madras High Court has ruled that maternity leave taken by doctors during their compulsory bond service in government hospitals must be counted as part of the bond period. The decision brings relief to medical professionals across Tamil Nadu, affirming that maternity rights cannot be curtailed by service bond conditions—even when the individual is not a regular government employee.
The case centered on Dr. E. Krithikaa, who completed her MBBS in 2014 and later pursued an MS in General Surgery at Thanjavur Medical College. As per Tamil Nadu government rules, she signed a ₹40 lakh bond, committing to serve in a government hospital for two years after her postgraduate studies. She also submitted her original educational certificates as part of this agreement.
After joining Thittakudi Government Hospital as an Assistant Surgeon in 2019, Dr. Krithikaa served for a year before availing maternity leave. When she requested the return of her certificates, authorities refused, arguing she had not completed the full two-year bond, discounting the period of her maternity leave.
Dr. Krithikaa challenged this decision in court. While a single judge initially dismissed her plea, a Division Bench comprising Justices G.R. Swaminathan and K. Rajasekar overturned the order. The bench held that maternity leave is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution and is integral to the dignity and equality of women. The judges emphasized that the protections of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, and constitutional guarantees under Articles 14 and 21, extend to all women, including those serving under bond agreements rather than as regular employees.
Citing Supreme Court precedents, including Kavita Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi), the bench clarified that maternity leave must be treated as active service and cannot be excluded from the bond period. The court ordered the immediate return of Dr. Krithikaa’s certificates and affirmed that the rights conferred by the Maternity Benefit Act override any conflicting bond or prospectus conditions.
Legal experts say the ruling sets a precedent for similar cases nationwide, reinforcing that maternity benefits cannot be denied on technicalities or contractual loopholes.
Disclaimer: This article is based on information available as of July 1, 2025, from multiple news and legal sources. The summary provided does not constitute legal advice. For the full text of the judgment or for advice on similar cases, readers should consult the official court order or a qualified legal professional.
