0 0
Read Time:7 Minute, 45 Second

NEW DELHI – In a significant move to bolster the nation’s nutritional security and commercial accountability, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has dramatically scaled up its regulatory activities. Following a report presented by Union Minister of State for Health and Family Welfare, Shri Prataprao Jadhav, in the Lok Sabha on March 13, 2026, it was revealed that the agency conducted over 56,000 risk-based inspections over the last three fiscal years.

With more than 5.18 lakh food samples analyzed across States and Union Territories (UTs), the government is signaling a “zero-tolerance” approach toward food adulteration and non-compliance. This expanded oversight comes at a time when consumer awareness regarding food quality and labeling transparency is at an all-time high.


A Data-Driven Approach: The Risk-Based Inspection System (RBIS)

The cornerstone of this regulatory surge is the Risk-Based Inspection System (RBIS). Moving away from arbitrary spot-checks, the FSSAI now utilizes a weighted frequency model where the intensity of oversight is dictated by the inherent risks associated with specific food categories.

According to the latest ministry data, the number of targeted inspections has seen a steady year-on-year incline:

Financial Year Total Risk-Based Inspections Conducted
2022-23 11,904
2023-24 18,098
2024-25 26,267
Total 56,269

“The shift to a risk-based model is a gold standard in food safety,” says Dr. Aranya Sen, a public health policy consultant not involved in the FSSAI report. “By focusing resources on high-risk sectors—such as dairy, meat, and processed weaning foods—the regulator can prevent large-scale foodborne illness outbreaks before they reach the consumer’s plate.”


Expanding the Testing Infrastructure

To support this massive influx of samples, the FSSAI has fortified India’s diagnostic capabilities. The network now comprises 252 notified food testing laboratories and 24 Referral Food Laboratories for appellate cases.

Recognizing that many rural areas lack immediate access to high-end labs, the “Food Safety on Wheels” (FSW) initiative has deployed 305 mobile units across 35 States and UTs. these units are equipped to perform on-the-spot tests for common adulterants in milk, spices, and oils, providing a “lab-at-the-doorstep” service for both enforcement and consumer awareness.


Targeting the “Hidden Killers”: Cooking Oil and Labelling

The FSSAI has introduced stringent measures to tackle two often-overlooked health hazards: the reuse of cooking oil and deceptive labeling.

1. The 25% Threshold for Polar Compounds

Repeated heating of vegetable oil leads to the formation of Total Polar Compounds (TPC), which have been linked to hypertension, atherosclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease. The FSSAI now mandates that any vegetable oil with a TPC level exceeding 25% must be discarded. Furthermore, Food Business Operators (FBOs) consuming more than 50 liters of oil per day must maintain meticulous disposal records.

2. Transparency in Labeling

The Food Safety and Standards (Labelling and Display) Regulations, 2020 are now being strictly enforced. These regulations require FBOs to provide clear information on allergens, nutritional content, and vegetarian/non-vegetarian status, ensuring that consumers can make informed dietary choices.


Enforcement and Penalties

The implementation of the Food Safety and Standards (FSS) Act, 2006, is a coordinated effort between the Centre and States. Currently, a workforce of 2,997 Food Safety Officers (FSOs) and 668 Designated Officers (DOs) are active at the field level.

Non-compliance has met with swift administrative action. Under Section 32 of the Act, the FSSAI issues Improvement Notices. Failure to rectify identified issues can lead to:

  • Immediate suspension or cancellation of food licenses.

  • Adjudication proceedings and financial penalties.

  • Criminal prosecution in cases of severe gravity (e.g., life-threatening adulteration).


Expert Commentary: The Road Ahead

While the numbers are impressive, independent experts urge caution regarding the depth of these audits. “Quantity must be matched by quality,” notes Vivek Bharadwaj, a food technologist. “Mandatory third-party audits for Central License holders are a great step, but we must ensure these empanelled agencies maintain high integrity and that state labs are consistently upgraded with high-end equipment to detect sophisticated synthetic adulterants.”

Public health advocates also point out that while enforcement is critical, “Eat Right” initiatives in schools and campuses must be scaled alongside inspections to foster a culture of safety from the ground up.


What This Means for Consumers

For the average citizen, these developments offer a safer marketplace, but the FSSAI emphasizes that the public is the “first line of defense.”

How to Protect Yourself:

  • Check the Label: Look for the FSSAI license number on all packaged food.

  • Report Concerns: If you suspect food fraud, use the FoSCoS portal (https://foscos.fssai.gov.in/consumergrievance/) or call the toll-free helpline at 1800-11-2100.

  • Monitor Oil Use: At home, avoid reusing frying oil multiple times, as the domestic kitchen is not exempt from the risks of Total Polar Compounds.

As the FSSAI continues to expand its digital and physical footprint, the goal remains clear: transforming food safety from a reactive regulatory hurdle into a proactive public health priority.


Medical Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered medical advice. Always consult with qualified healthcare professionals before making any health-related decisions or changes to your treatment plan. The information presented here is based on current research and expert opinions, which may evolve as new evidence emerges.


References

Official Reports and Statistics:

  • Press Information Bureau (PIB) Delhi. (2026, March 13). Steps taken to Strengthen Food Safety, Food Quality Monitoring and Consumer Protection. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

Annexure

State/UT wise details of Enforcement Samples analysed, found non-conforming and penal action taken during last 03 years
     (2024-2025)  (2023-2024)  (2022-2023)
S. No. State/UT No. of Samples Analysed Civil Cases Criminal Cases Cancelled License No. of Samples Analysed Civil Cases Criminal Cases Cancelled License No. of Samples Analysed Civil Cases Criminal Cases Cancelled License
Decided with Penalty No. of Convictions Decided with Penalty No. of Convictions Decided with Penalty No. of Convictions
1 Andaman And Nicobar Islands 810 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1200 58 0 0
2 Andhra Pradesh 5984 464 8 15 6439 646 8 40 3607 339 12 64
3 Arunachal Pradesh 125 7 0 5 501 2 0 25 258 0 0 20
4 Assam 1705 0 0 19 1139 0 0 0 602 0 0 0
5 Bihar 2863 25 0 7 2806 79 0 10 2935 39 0 10
6 Chandigarh 374 116 41 5 311 87 52 1 473 27 8 4
7 Chhattisgarh 2069 143 6 1 1373 86 2 0 1468 119 8 0
8 Dadra and Nagar Haveli & Daman & Diu 56 0 0 0 185 0 0 0 164 13 0 0
9 Delhi 2624 18 16 1 3412 36 12 1 3133 86 10 0
10 Goa 1172 11 0 0 599 17 0 1 699 11 0 4
11 Gujarat 12387 859 91 8 15841 1701 65 7 14562 547 24 15
12 Haryana 2233 599 59 20 3485 593 47 15 4445 915 35 25
13 Himachal Pradesh 1587 471 0 3 1618 376 2 6 2720 93 1 9
14 Jammu & Kashmir 6955 1,239 29 17 9057 1612 22 19 13502 1592 15 42
15 Jharkhand 364 52 0 1 384 59 0 2 943 44 8 1
16 Karnataka 9371 283 32 34 5492 75 16 50 3416 191 15 56
17 Kerala 10767 1,088 206 40 10792 854 134 137 8533 454 33 90
18 Ladakh 417 38 0 0 638 19 0 1 220 23 0 0
19 Lakshadweep 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 Madhya Pradesh 13920 2,597 22 3 13998 1938 46 10 12507 1908 71 22
21 Maharashtra 5403 1,147 0 9 5087 154 0 4 11077 198 5 17
22 Manipur 126 2 0 1 168 0 0 0 169 0 0 3
23 Meghalaya 388 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 409 0 0 0
24 Mizoram 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 0 0 0
25 Nagaland 223 0 0 0 138 3 0 1 109 0 0 1
26 Orissa 2282 27 0 2 2003 0 0 24 1368 47 0 40
27 Puducherry 173 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
28 Punjab 4131 333 8 1 6041 1204 102 0 8179 1404 5 1
29 Rajasthan 13840 3,114 30 2 18536 2181 12 0 13184 2435 4 1
30 Sikkim 254 0 0 0 231 0 0 0 279 4 0 0
31 Tamil Nadu 18071 1,536 492 7 18146 2195 478 36 24188 3714 678 47
32 Telangana 3347 125 0 1 6156 425 0 6 4809 315 0 9
33 Tripura 123 0 0 0 87 0 0 0 31 0 0 0
34 Uttar Pradesh 30380 14,920 215 16 27750 14627 163 9 30140 13148 251 50
35 Uttarakhand 1509 256 4 1 1998 332 0 1 1839 507 5 1
36 West Bengal 14502 672 6 0 5948 285 0 2 6203 233 0 0
  Total 170535 30142 1265 220 170513 29586 1161 408 177511 28464 1188 533
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %