0
0
In a significant verdict, the Calcutta High Court has upheld the rights of doctors employed with the state government to contest elections, provided they resign from their service. The ruling, delivered by a single-judge bench of Justice Rajasekhar Mantha, emphasizes the noble profession of medicine and underscores the potential for doctors to contribute to society through political engagement.
Justice Mantha’s observation came during the hearing of a case involving a state government doctor whose resignation letter was rejected by the state Health Department, citing clauses of the bond signed upon joining the service. Rejecting this contention, Justice Mantha emphasized that when a doctor aspires to contest elections, it reflects a desire to play a larger role in serving society.
“The profession of a doctor is inherently noble, and when a doctor seeks to participate in elections, it should be perceived as an intention to contribute significantly to society,” stated Justice Mantha.
The ruling asserts that any person employed in public services, including state-run medical services, should have the right to resign and pursue electoral ambitions. By removing hurdles that impede doctors from participating in electoral processes, the court aims to encourage greater engagement of qualified professionals in shaping public policy and governance.
The decision has been hailed by medical professionals and legal experts alike, who see it as a step towards promoting democratic participation and fostering a conducive environment for professionals to enter politics. It acknowledges the valuable contributions that doctors can make not only in healthcare but also in addressing broader societal challenges through political representation.
The implications of the ruling extend beyond individual cases, signaling a broader recognition of the importance of diverse voices in the political arena. It emphasizes the need for institutions to facilitate the transition of professionals from public service to political leadership, thereby enriching the democratic process.
As the verdict sets a precedent for doctors employed with the state government, it underscores the judiciary’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights and promoting democratic values. By affirming the electoral rights of doctors, the Calcutta High Court reaffirms its role in safeguarding the principles of equality and justice for all citizens.
